Score
93. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
94. Is the scope of Environmental health action plan defined?
<--- Score
95. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Environmental health action plan? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
96. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
97. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
98. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
99. Is there a clear Environmental health action plan case definition?
<--- Score
100. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
101. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
102. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Environmental health action plan changes?
<--- Score
103. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
104. Is Environmental health action plan currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
105. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
106. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
107. Have all basic functions of Environmental health action plan been defined?
<--- Score
108. How do you hand over Environmental health action plan context?
<--- Score
109. How does the Environmental health action plan manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
110. Are accountability and ownership for Environmental health action plan clearly defined?
<--- Score
111. Are the Environmental health action plan requirements testable?
<--- Score
112. When is/was the Environmental health action plan start date?
<--- Score
113. Is there a Environmental health action plan management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
114. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
115. How do you think the partners involved in Environmental health action plan would have defined success?
<--- Score
116. Why are you doing Environmental health action plan and what is the scope?
<--- Score
117. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
118. What is the definition of Environmental health action plan excellence?
<--- Score
119. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
120. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
121. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
122. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
123. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
124. Has a Environmental health action plan requirement not been met?
<--- Score
125. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Environmental health action plan?
<--- Score
126. What sources do you use to gather information for a Environmental health action plan study?
<--- Score
127. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
128. How do you manage changes in Environmental health action plan requirements?
<--- Score
129. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
130. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
131. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Environmental health action plan leverage and how?
<--- Score
132. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
133. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
134. Do you have a Environmental health action plan success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
135. What are (control) requirements for Environmental health action plan Information?
