Executing Process Group: Gaming As A Service217
3.1 Team Member Status Report: Gaming As A Service219
3.2 Change Request: Gaming As A Service221
3.3 Change Log: Gaming As A Service223
3.4 Decision Log: Gaming As A Service225
3.5 Quality Audit: Gaming As A Service227
3.6 Team Directory: Gaming As A Service229
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Gaming As A Service231
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Gaming As A Service233
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Gaming As A Service235
3.10 Issue Log: Gaming As A Service237
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Gaming As A Service239
4.1 Project Performance Report: Gaming As A Service241
4.2 Variance Analysis: Gaming As A Service243
4.3 Earned Value Status: Gaming As A Service245
4.4 Risk Audit: Gaming As A Service247
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Gaming As A Service249
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Gaming As A Service251
5.0 Closing Process Group: Gaming As A Service253
5.1 Procurement Audit: Gaming As A Service255
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Gaming As A Service257
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Gaming As A Service259
5.4 Lessons Learned: Gaming As A Service261
Index263
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Gaming as a service delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
2. Why is this needed?
<--- Score
3. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
4. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?
<--- Score
5. What Gaming as a service capabilities do you need?
<--- Score
6. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
7. Which needs are not included or involved?
<--- Score
8. Do you know what you need to know about Gaming as a service?
<--- Score
9. What is the recognized need?
<--- Score
10. Are there recognized Gaming as a service problems?
<--- Score
11. How do you assess your Gaming as a service workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?
<--- Score
12. Have you identified your Gaming as a service key performance indicators?
<--- Score
13. Where do you need to exercise leadership?
<--- Score
14. What extra resources will you need?
<--- Score
15. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
16. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
17. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?
<--- Score
18. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?
<--- Score
19. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
20. Will Gaming as a service deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?
<--- Score
21. Who should resolve the Gaming as a service issues?
<--- Score
22. What do employees need in the short term?
<--- Score
23. What is the Gaming as a service problem definition? What do you need to resolve?
<--- Score
24. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Gaming as a service as an effective investment?
<--- Score
25. What does Gaming as a service success mean to the stakeholders?
<--- Score
26. What is the problem or issue?
<--- Score
27. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
28. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Gaming as a service team, Gaming as a service itself?
<---
