Are losses recognized in a timely manner?
<--- Score
74. How do you recognize an Gaming as a service objection?
<--- Score
75. What needs to be done?
<--- Score
76. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
77. Is the need for organizational change recognized?
<--- Score
78. What information do users need?
<--- Score
79. What do you need to start doing?
<--- Score
80. What are the clients issues and concerns?
<--- Score
81. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?
<--- Score
82. What resources or support might you need?
<--- Score
83. Why the need?
<--- Score
84. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
85. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
86. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Gaming as a service?
<--- Score
87. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?
<--- Score
88. What are the expected benefits of Gaming as a service to the stakeholder?
<--- Score
89. How are you going to measure success?
<--- Score
90. Consider your own Gaming as a service project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?
<--- Score
91. What are your needs in relation to Gaming as a service skills, labor, equipment, and markets?
<--- Score
92. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Gaming as a service leader?
<--- Score
93. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?
<--- Score
94. What is the problem and/or vulnerability?
<--- Score
95. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Gaming as a service Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
2. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
3. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
4. How does the Gaming as a service manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
5. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
6. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
7. Has the Gaming as a service work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
8. When is/was the Gaming as a service start date?
<--- Score
9. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
10. Is there a clear Gaming as a service case definition?
<--- Score
11. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
12. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Gaming as a service changes?
<--- Score
13. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
14. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
15. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
16. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
