<--- Score
60. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
61. What is the scope of Gaming as a service?
<--- Score
62. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
63. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
64. Will a Gaming as a service production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
65. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
66. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
67. Is Gaming as a service required?
<--- Score
68. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
69. Is the Gaming as a service scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
70. What was the context?
<--- Score
71. Do you all define Gaming as a service in the same way?
<--- Score
72. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
73. How would you define Gaming as a service leadership?
<--- Score
74. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
75. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
76. Is Gaming as a service linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
77. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
78. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
79. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
80. How do you manage unclear Gaming as a service requirements?
<--- Score
81. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
82. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
83. What is the scope of the Gaming as a service work?
<--- Score
84. What are the core elements of the Gaming as a service business case?
<--- Score
85. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
86. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
87. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
88. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Gaming as a service leverage and how?
<--- Score
89. Who are the Gaming as a service improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
90. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
91. What are the Gaming as a service use cases?
<--- Score
92. What Gaming as a service services do you require?
<--- Score
93. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
94. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
95. Are accountability and ownership for Gaming as a service clearly defined?
<--- Score
96. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
97. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Gaming as a service?
<--- Score
98. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Gaming as a service? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
99. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Gaming as a service results are met?
<--- Score
100. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
101. What are the Gaming as a service tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
102. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
103. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
104. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<---
