Do you all define System Protection in the same way?
<--- Score
60. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does System Protection leverage and how?
<--- Score
61. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
62. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that System Protection brings?
<--- Score
63. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
64. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
65. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
66. Will team members regularly document their System Protection work?
<--- Score
67. Is the System Protection scope manageable?
<--- Score
68. How do you manage changes in System Protection requirements?
<--- Score
69. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
70. Is there a clear System Protection case definition?
<--- Score
71. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
72. Will team members perform System Protection work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
73. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
74. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
75. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
76. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform System Protection work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
77. What was the context?
<--- Score
78. What is the scope of System Protection?
<--- Score
79. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
80. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
81. How will the System Protection team and the group measure complete success of System Protection?
<--- Score
82. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
83. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
84. What system do you use for gathering System Protection information?
<--- Score
85. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
86. How do you gather System Protection requirements?
<--- Score
87. Is there a critical path to deliver System Protection results?
<--- Score
88. What happens if System Protection’s scope changes?
<--- Score
89. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
90. How does the System Protection manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
91. What System Protection services do you require?
<--- Score
92. What are the System Protection use cases?
<--- Score
93. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
94. How can the value of System Protection be defined?
<--- Score
95. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
96. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the System Protection goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
97. Will a System Protection production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
98. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
99. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
100. How do you catch System Protection definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
101. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected System Protection results are met?
<--- Score
102. Are improvement team members fully trained on System Protection?
<---
