Management Plan: Regenerative Farming214
3.0 Executing Process Group: Regenerative Farming216
3.1 Team Member Status Report: Regenerative Farming218
3.2 Change Request: Regenerative Farming220
3.3 Change Log: Regenerative Farming222
3.4 Decision Log: Regenerative Farming224
3.5 Quality Audit: Regenerative Farming226
3.6 Team Directory: Regenerative Farming228
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Regenerative Farming230
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Regenerative Farming232
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Regenerative Farming234
3.10 Issue Log: Regenerative Farming236
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Regenerative Farming238
4.1 Project Performance Report: Regenerative Farming240
4.2 Variance Analysis: Regenerative Farming242
4.3 Earned Value Status: Regenerative Farming244
4.4 Risk Audit: Regenerative Farming246
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Regenerative Farming248
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Regenerative Farming250
5.0 Closing Process Group: Regenerative Farming252
5.1 Procurement Audit: Regenerative Farming254
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Regenerative Farming257
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Regenerative Farming259
5.4 Lessons Learned: Regenerative Farming261
Index263
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Have you identified your Regenerative farming key performance indicators?
<--- Score
2. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with Regenerative farming?
<--- Score
3. What does Regenerative farming success mean to the stakeholders?
<--- Score
4. Why is this needed?
<--- Score
5. How are the Regenerative farming’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?
<--- Score
6. For your Regenerative farming project, identify and describe the business environment, is there more than one layer to the business environment?
<--- Score
7. Is the need for organizational change recognized?
<--- Score
8. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?
<--- Score
9. How are training requirements identified?
<--- Score
10. Who needs to know about Regenerative farming?
<--- Score
11. Where is training needed?
<--- Score
12. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Regenerative farming? In other words, what are the risks, if Regenerative farming does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
13. Who should resolve the Regenerative farming issues?
<--- Score
14. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
15. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
16. Who needs to know?
<--- Score
17. Are there Regenerative farming problems defined?
<--- Score
18. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
19. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
20. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
21. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?
<--- Score
22. What needs to be done?
<--- Score
23. Do you need to avoid or amend any Regenerative farming activities?
<--- Score
24. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Regenerative farming?
<--- Score
25. What Regenerative farming capabilities do you need?
<--- Score
26. Does your organization need more Regenerative farming education?
<--- Score
27. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Regenerative farming delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
28. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
29.
