business case?
<--- Score
62. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
63. What is the context?
<--- Score
64. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
65. How can the value of Regenerative farming be defined?
<--- Score
66. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
67. How do you catch Regenerative farming definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
68. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
69. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Regenerative farming work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
70. Are the Regenerative farming requirements testable?
<--- Score
71. Is the Regenerative farming scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
72. Who is gathering Regenerative farming information?
<--- Score
73. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
74. Do you have a Regenerative farming success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
75. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
76. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
77. What sources do you use to gather information for a Regenerative farming study?
<--- Score
78. What are the core elements of the Regenerative farming business case?
<--- Score
79. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
80. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
81. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Regenerative farming changes?
<--- Score
82. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
83. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
84. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
85. What Regenerative farming services do you require?
<--- Score
86. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
87. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
88. What is the definition of Regenerative farming excellence?
<--- Score
89. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
90. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
91. Is there a critical path to deliver Regenerative farming results?
<--- Score
92. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
93. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
94. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
95. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
96. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Regenerative farming brings?
<--- Score
97. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
98. Are accountability and ownership for Regenerative farming clearly defined?
<--- Score
99. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
100. How do you manage unclear Regenerative farming requirements?
<--- Score
101. How do you manage changes in Regenerative farming requirements?
<--- Score
102. How have you defined all Regenerative farming requirements first?
<--- Score
103. What Regenerative farming requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
104. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
105. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<---
