Score
73. Who else hopes to benefit from it?
<--- Score
74. What Regenerative farming events should you attend?
<--- Score
75. What Regenerative farming problem should be solved?
<--- Score
76. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?
<--- Score
77. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?
<--- Score
78. Who needs budgets?
<--- Score
79. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?
<--- Score
80. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?
<--- Score
81. What situation(s) led to this Regenerative farming Self Assessment?
<--- Score
82. Are losses recognized in a timely manner?
<--- Score
83. What Regenerative farming coordination do you need?
<--- Score
84. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?
<--- Score
85. Is it needed?
<--- Score
86. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?
<--- Score
87. What would happen if Regenerative farming weren’t done?
<--- Score
88. What needs to stay?
<--- Score
89. What information do users need?
<--- Score
90. Will Regenerative farming deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?
<--- Score
91. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?
<--- Score
92. Do you know what you need to know about Regenerative farming?
<--- Score
93. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
94. What do employees need in the short term?
<--- Score
95. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?
<--- Score
96. How do you recognize an Regenerative farming objection?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Regenerative farming Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
2. What are (control) requirements for Regenerative farming Information?
<--- Score
3. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Regenerative farming leverage and how?
<--- Score
4. What gets examined?
<--- Score
5. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
6. Is special Regenerative farming user knowledge required?
<--- Score
7. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
8. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
9. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
10. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Regenerative farming?
<--- Score
11. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
12. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
13. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
14. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
15. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
16. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<---
