for audit information?
<--- Score
57. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
58. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
59. Are the Blockchain as a service requirements complete?
<--- Score
60. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
61. How will the Blockchain as a service team and the group measure complete success of Blockchain as a service?
<--- Score
62. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
63. Is Blockchain as a service currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
64. Is there a critical path to deliver Blockchain as a service results?
<--- Score
65. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Blockchain as a service results are met?
<--- Score
66. How do you think the partners involved in Blockchain as a service would have defined success?
<--- Score
67. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
68. Are accountability and ownership for Blockchain as a service clearly defined?
<--- Score
69. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Blockchain as a service brings?
<--- Score
70. Who approved the Blockchain as a service scope?
<--- Score
71. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
72. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
73. How have you defined all Blockchain as a service requirements first?
<--- Score
74. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Blockchain as a service leverage and how?
<--- Score
75. What is the scope?
<--- Score
76. How does the Blockchain as a service manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
77. What system do you use for gathering Blockchain as a service information?
<--- Score
78. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
79. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
80. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
81. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
82. How do you catch Blockchain as a service definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
83. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
84. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
85. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
86. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
87. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
88. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
89. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
90. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
91. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
92. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Blockchain as a service? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
93. Is the Blockchain as a service scope manageable?
<--- Score
94. What are (control) requirements for Blockchain as a service Information?
<--- Score
95. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
96. Who are the Blockchain as a service improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
97. What are the core elements of the Blockchain as a service business case?
<--- Score
98. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
99. What is the definition of Blockchain as a service excellence?
<--- Score
100.
