In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
101. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
102. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
103. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
104. What are the record-keeping requirements of Blockchain as a service activities?
<--- Score
105. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
106. How do you hand over Blockchain as a service context?
<--- Score
107. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
108. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
109. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
110. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
111. How can the value of Blockchain as a service be defined?
<--- Score
112. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
113. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
114. What is in scope?
<--- Score
115. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
116. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
117. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
118. How do you gather Blockchain as a service requirements?
<--- Score
119. Are the Blockchain as a service requirements testable?
<--- Score
120. Do you have a Blockchain as a service success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
121. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
122. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
123. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
124. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
125. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
126. What would be the goal or target for a Blockchain as a service’s improvement team?
<--- Score
127. Is the scope of Blockchain as a service defined?
<--- Score
128. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
129. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
130. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Blockchain as a service Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What measurements are being captured?
<--- Score
2. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Blockchain as a service services/products?
<--- Score
3. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?
<--- Score
4. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?
<--- Score
5. How do you measure success?
<--- Score
6. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?
<--- Score
7. How frequently do you track Blockchain as a service measures?
<--- Score
8. What are your key Blockchain as a service organizational performance measures, including key short and longer-term financial measures?
