What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
10. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Risk and Safety Statement changes?
<--- Score
11. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
12. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
13. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
14. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
15. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
16. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
17. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
18. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
19. Is the scope of Risk and Safety Statement defined?
<--- Score
20. What system do you use for gathering Risk and Safety Statement information?
<--- Score
21. Is there a critical path to deliver Risk and Safety Statement results?
<--- Score
22. What are the Risk and Safety Statement tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
23. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
24. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
25. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
26. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
27. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
28. Is there any additional Risk and Safety Statement definition of success?
<--- Score
29. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
30. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
31. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
32. Has the Risk and Safety Statement work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
33. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
34. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
35. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Risk and Safety Statement work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
36. How do you think the partners involved in Risk and Safety Statement would have defined success?
<--- Score
37. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
38. What is the scope?
<--- Score
39. What is in scope?
<--- Score
40. What are (control) requirements for Risk and Safety Statement Information?
<--- Score
41. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
42. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
43. Are improvement team members fully trained on Risk and Safety Statement?
<--- Score
44. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
45. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
46. Is the Risk and Safety Statement scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
47. Is there a Risk and Safety Statement management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
48. When is/was the Risk and Safety Statement start date?
<--- Score
49. How do you hand over Risk and Safety Statement context?
<--- Score
50. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
51. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
52. Has a Risk and Safety Statement requirement not been met?
<---
