Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
97. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Risk and Safety Statement results are met?
<--- Score
98. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
99. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
100. Will team members regularly document their Risk and Safety Statement work?
<--- Score
101. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
102. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
103. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
104. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
105. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Risk and Safety Statement? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
106. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Risk and Safety Statement brings?
<--- Score
107. Is special Risk and Safety Statement user knowledge required?
<--- Score
108. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
109. How does the Risk and Safety Statement manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
110. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
111. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
112. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Risk and Safety Statement goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
113. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
114. What are the core elements of the Risk and Safety Statement business case?
<--- Score
115. Is Risk and Safety Statement linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
116. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
117. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
118. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
119. What is the scope of the Risk and Safety Statement effort?
<--- Score
120. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
121. How would you define Risk and Safety Statement leadership?
<--- Score
122. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Risk and Safety Statement?
<--- Score
123. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
124. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
125. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
126. How can the value of Risk and Safety Statement be defined?
<--- Score
127. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
128. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
129. How do you catch Risk and Safety Statement definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
130. What Risk and Safety Statement requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
131. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
132. Is Risk and Safety Statement required?
<--- Score
133. Do you all define Risk and Safety Statement in the same way?
<--- Score
134. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
135. Is the Risk and Safety Statement scope manageable?
<--- Score
136. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
137. What is the definition of Risk and Safety Statement excellence?
<--- Score
138. Why are you doing Risk and Safety Statement and what is the scope?
<--- Score
139. Are accountability and ownership for Risk and Safety Statement clearly defined?
<---
