Score
44. Will team members regularly document their Identifying and Managing Project Risk work?
<--- Score
45. Is Identifying and Managing Project Risk linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
46. When is/was the Identifying and Managing Project Risk start date?
<--- Score
47. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
48. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
49. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
50. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
51. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
52. What is the scope of the Identifying and Managing Project Risk effort?
<--- Score
53. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
54. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
55. What system do you use for gathering Identifying and Managing Project Risk information?
<--- Score
56. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
57. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
58. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
59. What are the Identifying and Managing Project Risk use cases?
<--- Score
60. Are stakeholder processes mapped?
<--- Score
61. What sources do you use to gather information for a Identifying and Managing Project Risk study?
<--- Score
62. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
63. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
64. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
65. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
66. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
67. Are the Identifying and Managing Project Risk requirements complete?
<--- Score
68. What gets examined?
<--- Score
69. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
70. What are the Identifying and Managing Project Risk tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
71. Is special Identifying and Managing Project Risk user knowledge required?
<--- Score
72. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
73. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
74. Are accountability and ownership for Identifying and Managing Project Risk clearly defined?
<--- Score
75. Are improvement team members fully trained on Identifying and Managing Project Risk?
<--- Score
76. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
77. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
78. What was the context?
<--- Score
79. What is the definition of Identifying and Managing Project Risk excellence?
<--- Score
80. Is Identifying and Managing Project Risk currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
81. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Identifying and Managing Project Risk goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
82. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
83. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Identifying and Managing Project Risk brings?
<--- Score
84. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
85. What are the tasks and definitions?
<---
