Score
64. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
65. What happens if Closed systems’s scope changes?
<--- Score
66. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
67. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
68. What sources do you use to gather information for a Closed systems study?
<--- Score
69. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
70. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
71. What Closed systems services do you require?
<--- Score
72. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Closed systems? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
73. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
74. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
75. What would be the goal or target for a Closed systems’s improvement team?
<--- Score
76. Is the Closed systems scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
77. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
78. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
79. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
80. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
81. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
82. How do you manage unclear Closed systems requirements?
<--- Score
83. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Closed systems changes?
<--- Score
84. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
85. How do you think the partners involved in Closed systems would have defined success?
<--- Score
86. Is there a clear Closed systems case definition?
<--- Score
87. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
88. What is in scope?
<--- Score
89. What is the scope of Closed systems?
<--- Score
90. What are (control) requirements for Closed systems Information?
<--- Score
91. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Closed systems leverage and how?
<--- Score
92. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
93. Who is gathering Closed systems information?
<--- Score
94. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
95. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
96. Why are you doing Closed systems and what is the scope?
<--- Score
97. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
98. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
99. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
100. How will the Closed systems team and the group measure complete success of Closed systems?
<--- Score
101. Has the Closed systems work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
102. How do you manage changes in Closed systems requirements?
<--- Score
103. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
104. Are stakeholder processes mapped?
<--- Score
105. What is the context?
<--- Score
106. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
107. Is there a critical path to deliver Closed systems results?
<--- Score
108. Is there any additional Closed systems definition of success?
<---
