Score
65. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
66. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
67. How have you defined all Project objective requirements first?
<--- Score
68. Are security requirements met in contract management?
<--- Score
69. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
70. Does the contract include defined project objectives?
<--- Score
71. Are project objectives and performance criteria defined?
<--- Score
72. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
73. What happens if Project objective’s scope changes?
<--- Score
74. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
75. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
76. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
77. What was the context?
<--- Score
78. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
79. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
80. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
81. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
82. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
83. What are the Project objective tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
84. Are the project objectives clearly defined?
<--- Score
85. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Project objective?
<--- Score
86. Are project objectives and performance criteria well defined?
<--- Score
87. How do you catch Project objective definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
88. What Project objective services do you require?
<--- Score
89. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
90. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
91. What are (control) requirements for Project objective Information?
<--- Score
92. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
93. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
94. How do you gather Project objective requirements?
<--- Score
95. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
96. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
97. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
98. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
99. What are the Project objective use cases?
<--- Score
100. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
101. Have the project objectives been defined?
<--- Score
102. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
103. How would you define Project objective leadership?
<--- Score
104. Is the Project objective scope manageable?
<--- Score
105. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
106. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
107. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
108. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Project objective changes?
<--- Score
109. What is in scope?
<---
