2.36 Procurement Management Plan: Learning Management Software210
2.37 Source Selection Criteria: Learning Management Software212
2.38 Stakeholder Management Plan: Learning Management Software214
2.39 Change Management Plan: Learning Management Software216
3.0 Executing Process Group: Learning Management Software218
3.1 Team Member Status Report: Learning Management Software220
3.2 Change Request: Learning Management Software222
3.3 Change Log: Learning Management Software224
3.4 Decision Log: Learning Management Software226
3.5 Quality Audit: Learning Management Software228
3.6 Team Directory: Learning Management Software231
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Learning Management Software233
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Learning Management Software235
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Learning Management Software237
3.10 Issue Log: Learning Management Software239
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Learning Management Software241
4.1 Project Performance Report: Learning Management Software243
4.2 Variance Analysis: Learning Management Software245
4.3 Earned Value Status: Learning Management Software247
4.4 Risk Audit: Learning Management Software249
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Learning Management Software251
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Learning Management Software253
5.0 Closing Process Group: Learning Management Software255
5.1 Procurement Audit: Learning Management Software257
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Learning Management Software260
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Learning Management Software262
5.4 Lessons Learned: Learning Management Software264
Index266
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What situation(s) led to this Learning management software Self Assessment?
<--- Score
2. What needs to be done?
<--- Score
3. Will Learning management software deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?
<--- Score
4. Consider your own Learning management software project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?
<--- Score
5. Have you identified your Learning management software key performance indicators?
<--- Score
6. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Learning management software team, Learning management software itself?
<--- Score
7. Which needs are not included or involved?
<--- Score
8. Why is this needed?
<--- Score
9. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
10. What do employees need in the short term?
<--- Score
11. What does Learning management software success mean to the stakeholders?
<--- Score
12. Which issues are too important to ignore?
<--- Score
13. Who else hopes to benefit from it?
<--- Score
14. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Learning management software? In other words, what are the risks, if Learning management software does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
15. Is the need for organizational change recognized?
<--- Score
16. How do you assess your Learning management software workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?
<--- Score
17. Do you recognize Learning management software achievements?
<--- Score
18. What Learning management software problem should be solved?
<--- Score
19. Do you need different information or graphics?
<--- Score
20. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
21. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
22. When a Learning management software manager recognizes a problem, what options are available?
<--- Score
23. Why the need?
<--- Score
24. Are there recognized Learning management software problems?
<--- Score
25.
