style="font-size:15px;"> 23. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?
<--- Score
24. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
25. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
26. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?
<--- Score
27. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?
<--- Score
28. What are the expected benefits of Software Performance Engineering to the stakeholder?
<--- Score
29. How do you recognize an objection?
<--- Score
30. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Software Performance Engineering will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
31. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
32. Why the need?
<--- Score
33. What do you need to start doing?
<--- Score
34. For your Software Performance Engineering project, identify and describe the business environment, is there more than one layer to the business environment?
<--- Score
35. What Software Performance Engineering coordination do you need?
<--- Score
36. What resources or support might you need?
<--- Score
37. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?
<--- Score
38. Is it needed?
<--- Score
39. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
40. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?
<--- Score
41. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?
<--- Score
42. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
43. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Software Performance Engineering leader?
<--- Score
44. Are there Software Performance Engineering problems defined?
<--- Score
45. Who should resolve the Software Performance Engineering issues?
<--- Score
46. Are there recognized Software Performance Engineering problems?
<--- Score
47. How do you recognize an Software Performance Engineering objection?
<--- Score
48. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?
<--- Score
49. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
50. What would happen if Software Performance Engineering weren’t done?
<--- Score
51. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
52. Which information does the Software Performance Engineering business case need to include?
<--- Score
53. Is the need for organizational change recognized?
<--- Score
54. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?
<--- Score
55. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
56. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
57. What needs to stay?
<--- Score
58. Do you need different information or graphics?
<--- Score
59. What is the problem or issue?
<--- Score
60. Are losses recognized in a timely manner?
<--- Score
61. What is the recognized need?
<--- Score
62. Will it solve real problems?
<--- Score
63. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
64. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?
<--- Score
65. How do you assess your Software Performance Engineering workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?
<--- Score
66. What are your needs in relation to Software Performance Engineering skills, labor, equipment, and markets?
<--- Score
67. Will a response program
