requirements of Document Engineering activities?
<--- Score
100. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Document Engineering changes?
<--- Score
101. How would you define Document Engineering leadership?
<--- Score
102. How have you defined all Document Engineering requirements first?
<--- Score
103. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
104. How does the Document Engineering manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
105. How do you gather Document Engineering requirements?
<--- Score
106. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
107. What sources do you use to gather information for a Document Engineering study?
<--- Score
108. Are the Document Engineering requirements complete?
<--- Score
109. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
110. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
111. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
112. What is the scope?
<--- Score
113. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
114. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
115. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
116. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
117. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
118. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
119. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
120. Are accountability and ownership for Document Engineering clearly defined?
<--- Score
121. What would be the goal or target for a Document Engineering’s improvement team?
<--- Score
122. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
123. What was the context?
<--- Score
124. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
125. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Document Engineering work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
126. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
127. What are the Document Engineering use cases?
<--- Score
128. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
129. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
130. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
131. Has the Document Engineering work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
132. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
133. Who are the Document Engineering improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
134. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
135. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
136. Is the Document Engineering scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
137. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Document Engineering goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Document Engineering Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1
