Source Selection Criteria: Human Language Technology212
2.38 Stakeholder Management Plan: Human Language Technology214
2.39 Change Management Plan: Human Language Technology216
3.0 Executing Process Group: Human Language Technology218
3.1 Team Member Status Report: Human Language Technology220
3.2 Change Request: Human Language Technology222
3.3 Change Log: Human Language Technology224
3.4 Decision Log: Human Language Technology226
3.5 Quality Audit: Human Language Technology228
3.6 Team Directory: Human Language Technology231
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Human Language Technology233
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Human Language Technology235
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Human Language Technology238
3.10 Issue Log: Human Language Technology240
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Human Language Technology242
4.1 Project Performance Report: Human Language Technology244
4.2 Variance Analysis: Human Language Technology246
4.3 Earned Value Status: Human Language Technology248
4.4 Risk Audit: Human Language Technology250
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Human Language Technology252
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Human Language Technology254
5.0 Closing Process Group: Human Language Technology256
5.1 Procurement Audit: Human Language Technology258
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Human Language Technology261
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Human Language Technology263
5.4 Lessons Learned: Human Language Technology265
Index267
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
2. Is it needed?
<--- Score
3. What vendors make products that address the Human language technology needs?
<--- Score
4. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with Human language technology?
<--- Score
5. What information do users need?
<--- Score
6. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
7. What do you need to start doing?
<--- Score
8. Have you identified your Human language technology key performance indicators?
<--- Score
9. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?
<--- Score
10. What Human language technology events should you attend?
<--- Score
11. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will need?
<--- Score
12. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
13. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Human language technology delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
14. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?
<--- Score
15. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?
<--- Score
16. Are losses recognized in a timely manner?
<--- Score
17. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
18. Will Human language technology deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?
<--- Score
19. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Human language technology leader?
<--- Score
20. Are there recognized Human language technology problems?
<--- Score
21. What situation(s) led to this Human language technology Self Assessment?
<--- Score
22. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
23. What needs to be done?
<--- Score
24. Why is this needed?
<--- Score
25. Will it solve real problems?
<--- Score
26. Is it clear when you think of the day ahead of you what activities and tasks you need to complete?
<--- Score
27. What problems are you facing and
