Regarding this event the faculty at Göttingen took no action. As the prototype of the national, liberal German bourgeoisie, Ritschl was, for Barth, “a sturdy, dry, insensitive lump who notices nothing.” Cf. Barth to Thurneysen, 28 June 1922, in B-Th II, 88–89.
7. Barth, From Rousseau to Ritschl, 392.
8. McCormack, Critically Realistic, 38–41.
9. B-B, 153.
10. Busch, Karl Barth: His Life, 38.
11. Ibid., 39.
12. Barth, “Principles of Dogmatics according to Wilhelm Herrmann,” 238.
13. Marquardt, “Erster Bericht über Karl Barths ‘Sozialistisches Reden,’” 478.
14. In the edition of “Evangelium und Sozialismus, 1914, “S” is versed as S[afenwil], which is less convincing. Cf. Barth, Vorträge und kleinere Arbeiten, 2:731. Cf. Marquardt, “Erster Bericht über Karl Barths ‘Sozialistisches Reden,’” 470–88.
15. Grundmann, “Why Is Werner Sombart Not Part of the Core of Classical Sociology?” 257–87.
16. In this regard, Parsons said that Sombart has “assimilated the main content of Marx into the framework of historico-idealistic thought.” See Parsons, Structure of Social Action, 495.
17. Engels, “Supplement to ‘Capital Vol. 3,’” 893–94.
18. Barth, “Principles of Dogmatics according to Wilhelm Herrmann,” 238–39.
19. Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, 93.
20. Kant, Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals, 38.
21. Cohen, “Kant, 1896,” 70.
22. Marxismsus und Ethik, eds. Sandkühler and Rafael de la Vega, 17.
23. Ibid.
24. Marquardt, “Erster Bericht über Karl Barths ‘Sozialistisches Reden,’” 479.
25. Busch, Karl Barth: His Life, 44.
26. Ibid., 45.
27. Welch, Protestant Thought, 2:45.
28. Barth, “Principles of Dogmatics according to Wilhelm Herrmann,” 267.
29. Herrmann, “Warum bedarf unser Glaube geschichtlicher Tatsachen?” 214–38.
30. Busch, Karl Barth: His Life, 44.
31. Barth, “Principles of Dogmatics according to Wilhelm Herrmann,” 245.
32. Quoted in Welch, Protestant Thought, 2:45.
33. Barth, “Principles of Dogmatics according to Wilhelm Herrmann,” 248.
34. Herrmann, Systematic Theology, 20.
35. Quoted in Barth, “Principles of Dogmatics according to Wilhelm Herrmann,” 243.
36. Ibid., 248.
37. Herrmann, Ethik, 107.
38. Herrmann, Communion of the Christian with God, 9.
39. Barth, “Principles of Dogmatics according to Wilhelm Herrmann,” 249.
40. Ibid., 250.
41. Barth, “Moderne Theologie und Reichgottesarbeit,” 317–21.
42. Achelis, “Noch einmal: Moderne Theologie und Reichgottesarbeit,” 406–10; Drews, “Zum dritten Mal: Moderne Theologie und Reichgottesarbeit,” 475–79.
43. Barth, “Moderne Theologie und Reichgottesarbeit,” 317–18.
44. Barth, “Moderne Theologie und Reichgottesarbeit,” 319–21.
45. Dannemann, Theologie und Politik, 28–29.
46. Barth, “Antwort an D. Achelis und P. Drews,” 484; cf. McCormack, Critically Realistic, 72.
47. Busch, Karl Barth: His Life, 57.
48. Barth, “Der christliche Glaube und die Geschichte,” in Vorträge und kleinere Arbeiten, 2:149–212. This essay was later revised in light of Ernst Troeltsch’s famous lecture, “The Significance of the Historicity of Jesus for Our Faith” and published in the Schweizerische Theologische Zeitschrift (1912).
49. Husinger, Karl Barth and Radical Politics, 193.
50. McCormack,
