On The Art of Reading. Arthur Quiller-Couch

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу On The Art of Reading - Arthur Quiller-Couch страница 4

On The Art of Reading - Arthur Quiller-Couch

Скачать книгу

Knowledge I have, as the light cynic observed of a certain lady's past, only one serious objection—that there is so much of it. There is indeed so much of it that if with the best will in the world you devoted yourself to it as a mere scholar, you could not possibly digest its accumulated and still accumulating stores. As Sir Thomas Elyot wrote in the 16th century (using, you will observe, the very word of Mr. Hamerton's energetic but fed-up tradesman), 'Inconveniences always doe happen by ingurgitation and excessive feedings.' An old schoolmaster and a poet—Mr. James Rhoades, late of Sherborne—comments in words which I will quote, being unable to better them:

      This is no less true of the mind than of the body. I do not know that a well-informed man, as such, is more worthy of regard than a well-fed one. The brain, indeed, is a nobler organ than the stomach, but on that very account is the less to be excused for indulging in repletion. The temptation, I confess, is greater, because for the brain the banquet stands ever spread before our eyes, and is, unhappily, as indestructible as the widow's meal and oil.

      Only think what would become of us if the physical food, by which our bodies subsist, instead of being consumed by the eater, was passed on intact by every generation to the next, with the superadded hoards of all the ages, the earth's productive power meanwhile increasing year by year beneath the unflagging hand of Science, till, as Comus says, she

      would be quite surcharged with her own weight And strangled with her waste fertility.

      Should we rather not pull down our barns, and build smaller, and make bonfires of what they would not hold? And yet, with regard to Knowledge, the very opposite of this is what we do. We store the whole religiously, and that though not twice alone, as with the bees in Virgil, but scores of times in every year, is the teeming produce gathered in. And then we put a fearful pressure on ourselves and others to gorge of it as much as ever we can hold.

      Facit indignatio versus. My author, gathering heat, puts it somewhat dithyrambically: but there you have it, Gentlemen.

      If you crave for Knowledge, the banquet of Knowledge grows and groans on the board until the finer appetite sickens. If, still putting all your trust in Knowledge, you try to dodge the difficulty by specialising, you produce a brain bulging out inordinately on one side, on the other cut flat down and mostly paralytic at that: and in short so long as I hold that the Creator has an idea, of a man, so long shall I be sure that no uneven specialist realises it. The real tragedy of the Library at Alexandria was not that the incendiaries burned immensely, but that they had neither the leisure nor the taste to discriminate.

      VIII

      The old schoolmaster whom I quoted just now goes on:

      I believe, if the truth were known, men would be astonished at the small amount of learning with which a high degree of culture is compatible. In a moment of enthusiasm I ventured once to tell my 'English set' that if they could really master the ninth book of "Paradise Lost", so as to rise to the height of its great argument and incorporate all its beauties in themselves, they would at one blow, by virtue of that alone, become highly cultivated men. … More and more various learning might raise them to the same height by different paths, but could hardly raise them higher.

      Here let me interpose and quote the last three lines of that Book—three lines only; simple, unornamented, but for every man and every woman who have dwelt together since our first parents, in mere statement how wise!

      Thus they in mutual accusation spent

       The fruitless hours, but neither self-condemning; And of their vain contest appear'd no end.

      A parent afterwards told me (my schoolmaster adds) that his son went home and so buried himself in the book that food and sleep that day had no attraction for him. Next morning, I need hardly say, the difference in his appearance was remarkable: he had outgrown all his intellectual clothes.

      The end of this story strikes me, I confess, as rapid, and may be compared with that of the growth of Delian Apollo in the Homeric hymn; but we may agree that, in reading, it is not quantity so much that tells, as quality and thoroughness of digestion.

      IX

       What Does—What Knows—What Is. …

      I am not likely to depreciate to you the value of What Does, after spending my first twelve lectures up here, on the art and practice of Writing, encouraging you to do this thing which I daily delight in trying to do: as God forbid that anyone should hint a slightening word of what our sons and brothers are doing just now, and doing for us! But Peace being the normal condition of man's activity, I look around me for a vindication of what is noblest in What Does and am content with a passage from George Eliot's poem "Stradivarius", the gist of which is that God himself might conceivably make better fiddles than Stradivari's, but by no means certainly; since, as a fact, God orders his best fiddles of Stradivari. Says the great workman,

      'God be praised,

       Antonio Stradivari has an eye

       That winces at false work and loves the true,

       With hand and arm that play upon the tool

       As willingly as any singing bird

       Sets him to sing his morning roundelay,

       Because he likes to sing and likes the song.'

       Then Naldo: ''Tis a pretty kind of fame

       At best, that comes of making violins;

       And saves no masses, either. Thou wilt go

       To purgatory none the less.'

       But he:

       ''Twere purgatory here to make them ill;

       And for my fame—when any master holds

       'Twixt chin and hand a violin of mine,

       He will be glad that Stradivari lived,

       Made violins, and made them of the best.

       The masters only know whose work is good:

       They will choose mine, and while God gives them skill

       I give them instruments to play upon,

       God choosing me to help Him.'

       'What! Were God

       At fault for violins, thou absent?'

       'Yes;

       He were at fault for Stradivari's work.'

       'Why, many hold Giuseppe's

       violins As good as thine.'

       'May be: they are different.

       His quality declines: he spoils his hand

       With over-drinking. But were his the best,

       He could not work for two. My work is mine,

       And heresy or not, if my hand slacked

       I should rob God—since He is fullest good—

       Leaving a blank instead of violins.

Скачать книгу