M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111(3), 662–720. doi: 10.1037/0033‐295X.111.3.662.33 Hoffman, P., Ralph, M. A. L., & Woollams, A. M. (2015). Triangulation of the neurocomputational architecture underpinning reading aloud. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(28), E3719–E3728. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502032112.
34 Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Advances in Psychology, 94. Orthography, Phonology, Morphology, and Meaning (pp. 67–84). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
35 Lavric, A., Elchlepp, H., & Rastle, K. (2012). Tracking hierarchical processing in morphological decomposition with brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(4), 811–816. doi: 10.1037/a0028960.
36 Lelonkiewicz, J. R., Ktori, M., & Crepaldi, D. (2020). Morphemes as letter chunks: Discovering affixes through visual regularities. Journal of Memory and Language, 115, 104152. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104152.
37 Lewis, G., Solomyak, O., & Marantz, A. (2011). The neural basis of obligatory decomposition of suffixed words. Brain and Language, 118(3), 118–127. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.04.004.
38 Longtin, C. M., & Meunier, F. (2005). Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(1), 26–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.008.
39 Longtin, C. M., Segui, J., & Hallé, P. A. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(3), 313–334. doi: 10.1080/01690960244000036.
40 Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1994). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: I. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(2), 107–128. doi: 10.1037//0096‐3445.123.2.107.
41 Marelli, M., & Baroni, M. (2015). Affixation in semantic space: Modeling morpheme meanings with compositional distributional semantics. Psychological Review, 122(3), 485–515. doi: 10.1037/a0039267.
42 Marslen‐Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101(1), 3–33. doi: 10.1037/0033‐295X.101.1.3.
43 McCandliss, B. D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2003). The visual word form area: Expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(7), 293–299. doi: 10.1016/S1364‐6613(03)00134‐7.
44 McCormick, S. F., Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Is there a “fete” in “fetish”? Effects of orthographic opacity on morpho‐orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 307–326. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.05.006.
45 Melby‐Lervåg, M., Lyster, S. A. H., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta‐analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 322–352. doi: 10.1037/a0026744.
46 Mousikou, P., Beyersmann, E., Ktori, M., Javourey‐Drevet, L., Crepaldi, D., Ziegler, J. C., Grainger, J., & Schroeder, S. (2020). Orthographic consistency influences morphological processing in reading aloud: Evidence from a cross‐linguistic study. Developmental Science, e12952. doi: 0.1111/desc.12952.
47 Nagy, W., & Anderson, R. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19(3), 304–330. doi: 10.2307/747823.
48 Nation, K. (2009). Form–meaning links in the development of visual word recognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1536), 3665–3674. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0119.
49 Nation, K. (2017). Nurturing a lexical legacy: Reading experience is critical for the development of word reading skill. npj Science of Learning, 2(1), 1–4. doi: 10.1038/s41539‐017‐0004‐7.
50 Nation, K., & Cocksey, J. (2009). The relationship between knowing a word and reading it aloud in children’s word reading development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(3), 296–308. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.03.004.
51 Plaut, D. C., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2000). Are non‐semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4–5), 445–485. doi: 10.1080/01690960050119661.
52 Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi‐regular domains. Psychological Review, 103(1), 56–115. doi: 10.1037//0033‐295X.103.1.56.
53 Pugh, K. R., Mencl, W. E., Jenner, A. R., Katz, L., Frost, S. J., Lee, J. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2000). Functional neuroimaging studies of reading and reading disability (developmental dyslexia). Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 6(3), 207–213. doi: 10.1002/1098‐2779(2000)6:3<207::AID‐MRDD8>3.0.CO;2‐P.
54 Rastle, K. (2019a). The place of morphology in learning to read in English. Cortex, 116, 45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.02.008.
55 Rastle, K. (2019b). EPS mid‐career prize lecture 2017: Writing systems, reading, and language. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(4), 677–692. doi: 10.1177/1747021819829696.
56 Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter? Cognitive Psychology, 53(2), 97–145. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.01.002.
57 Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(7–8), 942–971. doi: 10.1080/01690960802069730.
58 Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen‐Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time‐course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4–5), 507–537. doi: 10.1080/01690960050119689.
59 Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho‐orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 1090–1098. doi: 10.3758/BF03196742.
60 Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., Lesch, M. F., & Pollatsek, A. (1995). Phonological codes are automatically activated during reading: Evidence from an eye movement priming paradigm. Psychological Science, 6(1), 26–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‐9280.1995.tb00300.x.
61 Rueckl, J. G., & Raveh, M. (1999). The influence of morphological regularities on the dynamics of a connectionist network. Brain and Language, 68(1–2), 110–117. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2106.
62 Schiff, R., Raveh, M., & Fighel, A. (2012). The development of the Hebrew mental lexicon: When morphological representations become devoid of their meaning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(5), 383–403. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2011.571327.
63 Seidenberg, M. S. (2011). Reading in different writing systems: One architecture, multiple solutions. In P. McCardle, B. Miller, J. R. Lee, & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), The extraordinary brain series. Dyslexia across languages: Orthography and the brain–gene–behavior link (pp. 146–168). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.
64 Seymour, P. H., Aro, M., Erskine, J. M., & Collaboration with COST Action A8 Network. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies.
