Global ‘I’ in the Conditions of Reality”];
Although is not yet timely, it is necessary to keep in mind:
– We represent the “I” abstractly, i.e. the “One I” literally the General, which is each individual “Real aspect of the Entity” in reality – that is, it is present as the “Global aspect of the I” – nowhere specifically everywhere at the same time (It Is).
As an abstract – “One Self (“I”)” is absolutely static and therefore is inherent in a wave nature, however, “Global aspect of the Entity” = “One Self (“I”)”, or = “Global aspect of the Self (“I”)”, necessarily has a balance – a Systemic opposite “Real aspect of the Global Self (“I”)” – One and unique Only Fundamental Systemically Necessary Alive Being in the World, having access to the entire volume of experience and data. “The Global Aspect of the Entity in Reality” – He! Has unlimited possibilities – a potential equal to the sum of the potentials of all living beings in the World. Equivalent of the entire World. He, Incomprehensible. Eternal;
– We also imagine the “I” in reality – as the usual, familiar to us – “I” in the body”, active, independent, manifesting will and intention, comprehending experience, that is, a living being in a body inherent to the nature of particles, and being in the conditions of reality. The “I” itself is the “Spark of Life”, that is, an infinitely small part of the Soul <“One I”> – “Global aspect of the Entity”. But, each “Real aspect of the Entity”, from the position of the “Real aspect of the Global I”, is defined as “Not I” (– which, however, is quite natural);
The duality of the “I” is confirmed by the Corpuscular-Wave Dualism, and indicates Its connection with any dimensions. It is important that the Nature of particles is Reality, and in the absence of <living> dynamics – a Static Wave (all this is very important further, we will return to this more than once);
Considering the fact of contemplating mental images that are not located in the “Space with Explicit Realization”, we can assert that the current “Explicit Space” is not the only one. Objects contemplated mentally, as if “once again inside’ <for example, extracted from memory> – also three-dimensional, and are also located in space, but in some other one. However, in any case, we realize and “realize Ourselves’ in the “frame of explicit current reality”, and precisely in such conditions in which the use of Reason is possible – thinking, observation, analysis of the situation, we will include in the list meditative states, astral space, the state of sleep, hypnotic conditions, etc.
All this confirms our conclusion that it is “Consciousness’ that realizes a potentially unlimited number of necessary spaces – for the specific needs of the “I”, in this case for the realization of three-dimensional objects, but we do not doubt our ability to extract experience using higher-order dimensions (– any degree of dimensionality, if this turns out to be available). However, now we assert only the most obvious fact:
Space is not “Consciousness”;
This is a very important (for us) postulate, it will be useful not only in this study, but also in the life of someone who likes life :). Formulations and short theses that have a special meaning move us towards answers to the questions posed here; Considering that we can close our eyes – refusing to contemplate the situation, or deliberately fall asleep, of our own free will – ceasing the realization of reality, the question arises: Can the “I” be Self-sufficient?
A positive answer to this question, in the ideal conditions of existence established by us, would indicate the complete irrelevance of the “I”, which contradicts everything absolutely, that is, it is illogical and impossible, for a number of natural reasons. However, if “Any ideas, feelings, thoughts, data of memory, and anything contemplated, can exist exclusively in ‘Consciousness’, in the form which we consider actual and valid, then irrelevance implies the ‘One ‘I’’, and not in some Emptiness of the World, but namely as ‘There is only ‘I’’, including everything conceivable and inconceivable, together with Emptiness, if we admit that It is possible at all”. This means that “Consciousness” is inside the “I”, but has a direct relativity to the “I”. Also, in particular, that is – from the position of each living being in the World – this is so – taking into account all the facts about which we reasoned before;
Can it be proven that this is not so? (by disproving Solipsism)
We have found out before, we know, and have already said it many times, that we see everything we contemplate only in “Consciousness” (“I” see in Consciousness) and from the current position, “Consciousness”, as the Cause (processor, mean handler?), is around, and precisely outside. When “Consciousness” is around – this means that “I” is in the center of the current space (“within the frame”), extracts experience acting in its own body in the conditions of reality, represents Itself in this form (body);
Consciousness inside means what we point to when we discuss the mechanism of contemplation [from a photon, through a signal, etc.] and call it “the handler inside the Self” and then about “I”, but again inside, which contemplates “This same thing”, already as a result of processing and again – “Consciousness” turned out to be inside, this is what we focused on and discuss. You will say: – It looks like a trick. – The reaction is understandable, but let us maintain attention. Let us explain (even if it is early) that the cyclicity “to inside, inside, and inside,…” is due to the four-dimensionality, but the ambiguity arises due to the Duality of the “I”;
However, everything is solved quite simply: reasoning – we say that we are immersed inside, and to the “I”, but, at the same time, we are always inside the “Consciousness”. This is tracked very simply – any situation can be realized only in the corresponding space, in the “Consciousness” and by means of “It”. “I” acts as an active trigger and initiator, in the conditions of reality = in space, and realizing this space in the same time;
Consciousness is always outside (a priori, and in any case);
However, we would like to find a simpler scheme (concept) – in the hope of offering you more transparent examples, and to cite them as evidence as a consequence of other, more understandable, conclusions. Therefore, for now we will only assert the following – anything, anything, is and can exist only relatively. This has a special meaning. Let us recall the Harmony of the World (inner Balance). In connection with the established absolute impossibility of the unrelated existence of the “I”, an important conclusion follows:
“I” exists <mutually> relative with (-to) “Consciousness”;
According to the Fact of Being and the Act of Self-Validity – “I” is the Active aspect. From the position of any person – this is the Fact of Being “I” and “My life Activity” in this regard. “Consciousness” always seems static, and provides “I” with the opportunity to manifest Activity. This harmonious relationship is the fundamental basis – the mutual relativity
