apples spoil. Even if you did not see how the apple changed in the process, but a point on the wave of its state will not cause an error, based on the relationship of many, many factors in this situation, including physics, chemistry, biology, etc. If there is a Hamster in the house, in a cage, and he suddenly escapes, then the Entity will take it into account as a condition, then the Apple will most likely be eaten. The probability, which we call “most likely” will include the behavior of the Hamster, his intelligence, ability and opportunity to climb on the table, … and so on;
fig. 3
Let us imagine a wave of each object, a supposed “frame of reality”, i.e. in one range of events and data on states, penetrated by a beam of the system function, perpendicularly “touching” one point of each wave, but corresponding to the moment – exposing what is contemplated in the form of a sensory result of processing, in the internal volume of the virtual 3D sphere of the contemplated reality (see fig. 3This is the final state of the transformation process: between the existing state of objects (in the situation) previously available in memory, and the state of already transformed objects, through the imposition of experience, which is stored as new experience. The point of attention has no relation to time, but represents a point “on a conditional scale” of the dynamic state of an object, as a process of transforming its past state into the future (if this is clearer). This does not prevent us from using time as a method of measuring relations, quantities, parameters and states (this is what happens), then – the point of the real moment on the “time scale” corresponds to some specific point of state on the “scale of the state of the object”, but this is not the same thing at all – these are different scales considered at the same moment, albeit correlative, but conditionally. That is – according to an intentionally created, specific condition:
Time is a method of measuring relationships in real conditions accepted in a particular “Society’;
It is necessary to explain that in order to understand some (many) Laws, Truths, “things”, we are forced to consider them, breaking them down into successive chains, although these elements are phenomena of a non-physical nature, and since we do not have suitable tools of knowledge, except for those we use, then assuming “criticism outside attempts at understanding’ – we will continue without apology.
The moment of reality seems to roll on the waves of experience and events, directly dependent on the intention of the “I”. If the temporal reality is an abstract boundary between the past and the future, then it is also a moment of transition, when the “future time” changes its status to “past”;
The temporal extension of the “reality frame” cannot be measured, it does not exist. Consequently, anything dynamic, contemplated is unique and cannot be repeated under any circumstances. An object now, and “the same object” but in billionths of a second – differ from each other, almost like different objects. Everything is simple – object “A” existed before, but under the influence of experience and conditions <of its change>, it was transformed into object “B”. Here (with a smile) “The Ship of Theseus” comes to mind. A very strange “problem”. Does it even exist? Or …is it also a Myth?
Let us digress for a moment to the “problem” of replacing all parts of a whole (either sequentially or simultaneously, which is irrelevant). This implies a certain monument, however, one can consider a similar act of replacing all parts of any “complex things’ with the question: Will the “Thing Itself” and the essence of the attitude towards it be preserved? Will not the replacement of all parts affect the attitude, due to the loss of the Status of the Original, and that true uniqueness and belonging that the “thing’ possessed in the first place?
Any object, as we have found out, at each moment differs from its previous form, mass, and composition. This is confirmed by physics, chemistry, logic, and also metaphysics;
Therefore, before the replacement of the parts of the “Ship of Theseus”, the parts were already different from the original. The ship can be considered original only when it belongs to Theseus, and when Theseus himself is on it. In this case, the Essence of the replacement is not important – he (Theseus) could replace any parts, and at any time, this did not violate the ship’s ownership. Theseus does not exist, as does his ship. If we only recognize the ship and honor it as a monument, then nothing can change this attitude, and nevertheless, the latter does not solve the problem, but – it is definitely solved by the fact that a “thing’ cannot be static in the conditions of reality, and the details of such, too, change at every moment. That is why the replacement of those parts that have become unusable – does not in any way violate the “essence of the Ship Itself’, as well as other “repaired things’, otherwise, we assert that – the originals actually do not exist, but our attitude is the only proof of the originality of “things’;
* * *
Let us once again pay attention to the realization. When the mechanism of contemplation is studied, we break it down into parts (studying step by step). In this case, we perceive and realize the processes that occur not step by step (that is, in the current mode) and the realization of reality, as a flow – dynamically, as if flooding (streaming) events [from outside -> into inside], filling the space. Here it is necessary to clarify that it is possible to assert that only the visible volume is filled, that is, that “there is something around the corner” – it is impossible to prove unless we use conditions that are still unknown to us. We have to take into account the periods (stages) that we consider in our reasoning, and their seemingly greater length in comparison with the transition of the point of attention (the point of concentration) along the wave of change of the object, or situation, “from one point to another’ – in this sense, there is no “real dynamics” at all, and the expression “real dynamics” is absurd to the point of impossibility, as are “real objects and situations”. That is, the processes being studied, “occurring in reality’, can be understood as “illusory’ and “pseudo-real’, …if try to scrupulously understand the “System Structure” – this will come in handy;
Let’s continue the research using the separation method, as before (we have no other choice), otherwise it is impossible to understand, the final result is extremely important to us;
It is obvious that the “current objects mass” dynamically fills the <surrounding> space – coming from the outside -> in. Considering the transition inward, when photons cross the body’s boundary (see fig. 1), and looking at the initially previous picture, we understand that we are contemplating inside ourselves, leaving the “past” outside – and falling inward, together with our body;
Transform the step-by-step reasoning into a flow, it turns out that being in an active state, we fly to inside Ourselves, participating in events – constantly trying to gain experience and this corresponds to the phrase: “To live, you need to learn” (develop);
Why “trying”? Because experience should be divided into passive (just empty), which could not be extracted – which was missed in the development process, and effective – i.e. completely new, extracted through existing experience, necessary for further development and useful;
While exploring, we must constantly remember about the current flow (as a condition), more precisely: about our flight into the Self and immersion into the “I”. This is very important. There is a valuable meaning in connecting this interesting fact with the “catchphrase’ of Delphi: “know thyself”. The complex
