about the past, then this category includes long-term events, or certain extended states, which we draw in the same way as we imagine a “reality frame” and then return this picture for analysis – we do this again and again. Also, people often worry about something, and project a returning frame that irritates the psyche when they “voluntarily practice experiencing.” By the way, they receive a specific experience, which is subsequently necessarily transformed into something unpleasant;
Reality in such falsifications represents a whole “period of the necessary degree of clarity’. The clearest and most detailed “fresh past’ is available in memory for a shorter time than low-detailed events in their general presentation. Over time, the past will no longer be able to return as it was remembered at the moment of the realization of the long-past reality, since the attitude towards the events that happened will change radically. But, we are always learning the business of acquiring experience, and periodic analysis of similar <or similar> events, with special persistence, will lead to the acquisition of new experience, possibly more valuable than when analyzing the “obvious original’ – when we faced with a given situation “under real conditions”;
fig. 4
(wide time frames are supplemented with data from memory)
If we assume a “time machine” :) and move to a familiar past – for the traveler everything will be different, not like before, but completely new, and he will get a new experience. Everything that we do not see constantly, or almost daily – when meeting can turn out to be an amazing surprise;
It is appropriate to briefly talk about the future. First of all, it should be understood that the future as such does not exist, but one can fantasize in imagining it. The future, that is, “in mental space’, is realized only taking into account the existing experience, and if you suddenly move with a time machine “into the future’, five years ahead, and then return to the starting point, then when these same five years have passed, but in the usual manner, the place of visit will be realized completely differently, taking into account the experience acquired during the past five years, but in completely different conditions, including the experience gained when visiting the future using a time machine. And yet, this is nothing more than fantasy, because the future does not exist, but, from the current point of realization, as we have already established, it (the future) is formed from the existing experience, but travel to the past is most likely possible, or will become possible. But, there are also oddities;
* * *
If we assume that our X100-great-great-children (that’s ~5 thousand years about) did invent a time machine and traveled to our days. Theoretically, when returning back, they could take a traveler from our time with them, with the purpose of visiting (him) the future. In our 5000 years, with the complete absence of time for the Entity, and taking into account the exponential growth of the level of technology – they already have such a device, and then the UFOs flying everywhere – it is they (i.e. earthlings, people) from the future, flying and living among us, with the purpose of studying and, probably, correcting events in their time. They do not make contact because of the threat (development) of dangerous consequences due to interference. Let’s call it fantasy and continue, here, our down-to-earth :) research (just joke);
* * *
The future is only imagined, although the near future is assumed to be quite clear, and even as if it is visible, but it is far from a fact that it will be exactly as it is visualized. However, having even vague plans, we can anticipate the research and say that the flow of events, which seems to be habitual spontaneity, is “controlled’ by the “System of Entity Development”, but we will not go into this topic, at this stage it will simply amuse our wild fantasies;
We understand that “Reason”, as an instrument (“soft’, or software processor) – has an indirect relation to absolutely everything, for we are not even able to think of Ourselves without using Its comprehensive functionality;
“Reason” never leaves us as long as we (being in our right mind) are able to identify ourselves and qualify our own actions <…through the sense of conscience and moral laws>.
Thus, we separate the “I” from the “Reason”, there are grounds for this. Without the “Reason”, the “I” cannot recognize itself, define itself as concrete, or as actually existing, and precisely in a concrete body.
Therefore, “Reason” is an instrument, and “I” is not it (“Reason”). Consequently, “I” has no fundamental relativity to “Reason”, since, when available, It is “the Own Reason of the concrete I”. When the “I” realizes (this: ‘create’; through its “Consciousness”) its own existence in the conditions of reality, then – [“I” + “His Reason”] appears indivisible. “Reason”, without an operator (“I”) is the most ordinary wave function, and cannot exist independently in the conditions of reality – this is unthinkable due to an internal error, or, if we deliberately make such an error, then, logically, “I” will turn out to be transcendental, just as everything would become incomprehensible, including what we are discussing (not only here);
Without Reason everything is meaningless and incomprehensible;
Some people can go into the astral plane. The Reason, in this case, remains active together with the “I” and allows us to state this exit, i.e. – it also ‘leaves’ the body, if we can look at it (the body) from the outside and at the same time recognize it, lying separately, as our own;
We also know that in dreams the Reason functions rather strangely, but quite successfully, the “I” can think, experience emotions and manifest intention. It is also clear that the Reason is not space | the body is not the Reason, and | the Reason is not part of the body. The “I” defines itself exclusively through the Reason.
Therefore, in the process of cognition we will imply that “I” is rational (have Reason), possesses and controls Reason. “I” is and exists only in relation to Consciousness; Considering that “I”, the entire World, that is, everything absolutely, cannot exist outside of Consciousness, then Reason arises as a consequence of experience – forming and developing literally from scratch (presumably start in the process of conception). From all this it follows that the Reason is individual and absolutely unique, this is reliably proven and confirmed;
* * *
The strange thing is that even thoroughly understanding the entire logical chain, the Reason always tries to find a clue that maintains a connection with previous ideas about the structure of the World, being oppressed by the influence of stereotypes and other mental parasites, however, it is necessary, having discarded the dross of ignorance – to understand and imagine as it really is, without any emotions, extraneous thoughts and doubts. From position of everyone: “I want to understand this, and develop as effectively as possible”;
TWO-ASPECT (DUALISTIC) ENTITY
It is absolutely clear and obvious to us how the scheme of the contemplation mechanism leads to complete isolation and blocks the “Idea of the external reality of objects independent of “Consciousness”. At the same time, we also understand that we are talking about the impossibility of the existence of the physical World – such as we imagined it before, but otherwise nothing changes, except for the extremely important (!) emotional psichic relations.
