question is clearly defined’.
There are two ways in which you can choose to interpret this statement;
1.how aware are you that the answer to the question is clearly defined
2.for more in-depth analysis you can choose to gather evidence and confirm the answer to the question. This obviously will take more time, most Self-Assessment users opt for the first way to interpret the question and dig deeper later on based on the outcome of the overall Self-Assessment.
A score of ‘1’ would mean that the answer is not clear at all, where a ‘5’ would mean the answer is crystal clear and defined. Leave emtpy when the question is not applicable or you don’t want to answer it, you can skip it without affecting your score. Write your score in the space provided.
After you have responded to all the appropriate statements in each section, compute your average score for that section, using the formula provided, and round to the nearest tenth. Then transfer to the corresponding spoke in the Microsoft Ignite Scorecard on the second next page of the Self-Assessment.
Your completed Microsoft Ignite Scorecard will give you a clear presentation of which Microsoft Ignite areas need attention.
Microsoft Ignite
Scorecard Example
Example of how the finalized Scorecard can look like:
Microsoft Ignite
Scorecard
Your Scores:
BEGINNING OF THE
SELF-ASSESSMENT:
Table of Contents
About The Art of Service7
Included Resources - how to access7
Purpose of this Self-Assessment9
How to use the Self-Assessment10
Microsoft Ignite
Scorecard Example12
Microsoft Ignite
Scorecard13
BEGINNING OF THE
SELF-ASSESSMENT:14
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE15
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:26
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:42
CRITERION #4: ANALYZE:57
CRITERION #5: IMPROVE:73
CRITERION #6: CONTROL:88
CRITERION #7: SUSTAIN:101
Microsoft Ignite and Managing Projects, Criteria for Project Managers:126
1.0 Initiating Process Group: Microsoft Ignite127
1.1 Project Charter: Microsoft Ignite129
1.2 Stakeholder Register: Microsoft Ignite131
1.3 Stakeholder Analysis Matrix: Microsoft Ignite132
2.0 Planning Process Group: Microsoft Ignite134
2.1 Project Management Plan: Microsoft Ignite136
2.2 Scope Management Plan: Microsoft Ignite138
2.3 Requirements Management Plan: Microsoft Ignite140
2.4 Requirements Documentation: Microsoft Ignite142
2.5 Requirements Traceability Matrix: Microsoft Ignite144
2.6 Project Scope Statement: Microsoft Ignite146
2.7 Assumption and Constraint Log: Microsoft Ignite148
2.8 Work Breakdown Structure: Microsoft Ignite150
2.9 WBS Dictionary: Microsoft Ignite152
2.10 Schedule Management Plan: Microsoft Ignite154
2.11 Activity List: Microsoft Ignite156
2.12 Activity Attributes: Microsoft Ignite158
2.13 Milestone List: Microsoft Ignite160
2.14 Network Diagram: Microsoft Ignite162
2.15 Activity Resource Requirements: Microsoft Ignite164
2.16 Resource Breakdown Structure: Microsoft Ignite166
2.17 Activity Duration Estimates: Microsoft Ignite168
2.18 Duration Estimating Worksheet: Microsoft Ignite170
2.19 Project Schedule: Microsoft Ignite172
2.20 Cost Management Plan: Microsoft Ignite174
2.21 Activity Cost Estimates: Microsoft Ignite176
2.22 Cost Estimating Worksheet: Microsoft Ignite178
2.23 Cost Baseline: Microsoft Ignite180
2.24 Quality Management Plan: Microsoft Ignite182
2.25 Quality Metrics: Microsoft Ignite184
2.26 Process Improvement Plan: Microsoft Ignite186
2.27 Responsibility Assignment Matrix: Microsoft Ignite188
2.28 Roles and Responsibilities: Microsoft Ignite190
2.29 Human Resource Management Plan: Microsoft Ignite192
2.30 Communications Management Plan: Microsoft Ignite194
2.31 Risk Management Plan: Microsoft Ignite196
2.32 Risk Register: Microsoft Ignite198
2.33 Probability and Impact Assessment: Microsoft Ignite200
2.34 Probability and Impact Matrix: Microsoft Ignite202
2.35 Risk Data Sheet: Microsoft Ignite204
2.36 Procurement Management Plan: Microsoft Ignite206
2.37 Source Selection Criteria: Microsoft Ignite208
2.38 Stakeholder Management Plan: Microsoft Ignite210
2.39 Change Management Plan: Microsoft Ignite212
3.0 Executing Process Group: Microsoft Ignite214
3.1 Team
