Score
18. How do you think the partners involved in Microsoft Ignite would have defined success?
<--- Score
19. What are the record-keeping requirements of Microsoft Ignite activities?
<--- Score
20. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
21. Is Microsoft Ignite currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
22. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Microsoft Ignite work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
23. What would be the goal or target for a Microsoft Ignite’s improvement team?
<--- Score
24. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
25. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
26. Is there a Microsoft Ignite management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
27. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
28. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
29. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
30. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Microsoft Ignite brings?
<--- Score
31. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
32. When is/was the Microsoft Ignite start date?
<--- Score
33. How do you manage unclear Microsoft Ignite requirements?
<--- Score
34. What system do you use for gathering Microsoft Ignite information?
<--- Score
35. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
36. What Microsoft Ignite services do you require?
<--- Score
37. How do you hand over Microsoft Ignite context?
<--- Score
38. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
39. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
40. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
41. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
42. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
43. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
44. How do you manage changes in Microsoft Ignite requirements?
<--- Score
45. How have you defined all Microsoft Ignite requirements first?
<--- Score
46. How are consistent Microsoft Ignite definitions important?
<--- Score
47. Will team members regularly document their Microsoft Ignite work?
<--- Score
48. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
49. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
50. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
51. Has a Microsoft Ignite requirement not been met?
<--- Score
52. How can the value of Microsoft Ignite be defined?
<--- Score
53. Is the Microsoft Ignite scope manageable?
<--- Score
54. How do you catch Microsoft Ignite definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
55. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
56. What was the context?
<--- Score
57. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
58. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
59. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
60. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
61. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<---
