<--- Score
58. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Security Administration?
<--- Score
59. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
60. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Security Administration work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
61. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Security Administration changes?
<--- Score
62. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
63. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
64. Will team members perform Security Administration work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
65. Is Security Administration linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
66. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
67. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
68. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
69. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
70. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Security Administration brings?
<--- Score
71. What happens if Security Administration’s scope changes?
<--- Score
72. How do you gather Security Administration requirements?
<--- Score
73. What is the definition of Security Administration excellence?
<--- Score
74. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
75. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
76. Who are the Security Administration improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
77. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
78. What Security Administration services do you require?
<--- Score
79. Is the Security Administration scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
80. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
81. What was the context?
<--- Score
82. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
83. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
84. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
85. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Security Administration goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
86. What are the Security Administration use cases?
<--- Score
87. How does the Security Administration manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
88. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
89. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
90. Are accountability and ownership for Security Administration clearly defined?
<--- Score
91. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
92. What are the Security Administration tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
93. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
94. Will team members regularly document their Security Administration work?
<--- Score
95. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
96. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
97. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
98. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
99. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
100. Do you have a Security Administration success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<---
