Score
101. What is the scope of the Security Administration work?
<--- Score
102. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
103. Will a Security Administration production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
104. How have you defined all Security Administration requirements first?
<--- Score
105. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
106. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
107. Who is gathering Security Administration information?
<--- Score
108. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Security Administration results are met?
<--- Score
109. Has a Security Administration requirement not been met?
<--- Score
110. Are the Security Administration requirements testable?
<--- Score
111. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
112. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
113. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
114. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
115. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
116. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
117. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
118. How can the value of Security Administration be defined?
<--- Score
119. What system do you use for gathering Security Administration information?
<--- Score
120. How do you think the partners involved in Security Administration would have defined success?
<--- Score
121. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Security Administration leverage and how?
<--- Score
122. What is in scope?
<--- Score
123. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
124. How do you manage unclear Security Administration requirements?
<--- Score
125. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
126. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
127. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Security Administration? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
128. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
129. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
130. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
131. When is/was the Security Administration start date?
<--- Score
132. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
133. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
134. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
135. Has the Security Administration work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
136. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
137. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Security Administration Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1.
