Score
106. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
107. What is the context?
<--- Score
108. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
109. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
110. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
111. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
112. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
113. Has a TIBCO Software requirement not been met?
<--- Score
114. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
115. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
116. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
117. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
118. What would be the goal or target for a TIBCO Software’s improvement team?
<--- Score
119. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
120. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
121. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
122. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
123. When is/was the TIBCO Software start date?
<--- Score
124. Is there a clear TIBCO Software case definition?
<--- Score
125. What TIBCO Software requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
126. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
127. Do you all define TIBCO Software in the same way?
<--- Score
128. What gets examined?
<--- Score
129. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
130. Is TIBCO Software currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
131. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
132. How can the value of TIBCO Software be defined?
<--- Score
133. Is special TIBCO Software user knowledge required?
<--- Score
134. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
135. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
136. How would you define TIBCO Software leadership?
<--- Score
137. What happens if TIBCO Software’s scope changes?
<--- Score
138. Has the direction changed at all during the course of TIBCO Software? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
139. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
140. What system do you use for gathering TIBCO Software information?
<--- Score
141. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the TIBCO Software Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What tests verify requirements?
<--- Score
2. Are indirect costs charged to the TIBCO Software program?
<--- Score
3. Is the solution cost-effective?
<---
