Score
46. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
47. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
48. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
49. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
50. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
51. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
52. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
53. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
54. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
55. What system do you use for gathering Integrated vehicle health management information?
<--- Score
56. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
57. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
58. Has a Integrated vehicle health management requirement not been met?
<--- Score
59. Is special Integrated vehicle health management user knowledge required?
<--- Score
60. Have all basic functions of Integrated vehicle health management been defined?
<--- Score
61. How have you defined all Integrated vehicle health management requirements first?
<--- Score
62. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
63. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
64. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
65. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
66. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Integrated vehicle health management leverage and how?
<--- Score
67. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
68. How do you hand over Integrated vehicle health management context?
<--- Score
69. Is the Integrated vehicle health management scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
70. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
71. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
72. Is Integrated vehicle health management currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
73. How can the value of Integrated vehicle health management be defined?
<--- Score
74. Who is gathering Integrated vehicle health management information?
<--- Score
75. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Integrated vehicle health management brings?
<--- Score
76. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
77. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
78. What gets examined?
<--- Score
79. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
80. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
81. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
82. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
83. Is there any additional Integrated vehicle health management definition of success?
<--- Score
84. How do you manage changes in Integrated vehicle health management requirements?
<--- Score
85. Who approved the Integrated vehicle health management scope?
<--- Score
86. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
87. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
88. How does the Integrated vehicle health management manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
89. How are consistent Integrated vehicle health management
