Score
19. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Working Assets?
<--- Score
20. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
21. What was the context?
<--- Score
22. What are (control) requirements for Working Assets Information?
<--- Score
23. What happens if Working Assets’s scope changes?
<--- Score
24. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
25. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Working Assets goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
26. What system do you use for gathering Working Assets information?
<--- Score
27. What gets examined?
<--- Score
28. Are accountability and ownership for Working Assets clearly defined?
<--- Score
29. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
30. What is the scope of the Working Assets work?
<--- Score
31. Is there any additional Working Assets definition of success?
<--- Score
32. Is special Working Assets user knowledge required?
<--- Score
33. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
34. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
35. How would you define Working Assets leadership?
<--- Score
36. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
37. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
38. How does the Working Assets manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
39. How do you think the partners involved in Working Assets would have defined success?
<--- Score
40. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
41. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
42. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
43. Has a Working Assets requirement not been met?
<--- Score
44. What is the context?
<--- Score
45. Is Working Assets linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
46. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
47. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
48. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
49. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
50. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
51. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
52. How do you gather Working Assets requirements?
<--- Score
53. Are the Working Assets requirements testable?
<--- Score
54. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
55. How can the value of Working Assets be defined?
<--- Score
56. Is Working Assets currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
57. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
58. When is/was the Working Assets start date?
<--- Score
59. How are consistent Working Assets definitions important?
<--- Score
60. Are the Working Assets requirements complete?
<--- Score
61. How will the Working Assets team and the group measure complete success of Working Assets?
<--- Score
62. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
63. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
64. What
