77.
35. 35Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson.
44. 44Cochran, Sexual Harassment and the Law, 126–7.
45. 45Katharine T. Bartlett, Deborah L. Rhode, Joanna L. Grossman, and Samantha L. Buchalter, Gender, Law, and Policy (New York: Walters Kluwer, 2014), 312.
46. 46Hernandez, “What Not to Wear,” 295.
48. 48Angela Onwuachi-Willig, “Judgment: Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson,” in Kathryn M. Stanchi, Linda L. Berger, and Bridget J. Crawford, Feminist Judgments: Seventeen Opinions of the United States Supreme Court (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016), 312.
49. 49Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson.
50. 50Hernandez, “What Not to Wear,” 280.
51. 51Christina A. Bull, “The Implications of Admitting Evidence of a Sexual Harassment Plaintiff’s Speech and Dress in the Aftermath of Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson,” UCLA Law Review 41 (1993), 149.
54. 54Onwuachi-Willig, “Judgment,” 317–9.
55. 55Grace Dodier, “Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson: Sexual Harassment at Work,” Harvard Women’s Law Journal 10 (1987), 220.
56. 56Gwendolyn Mink, Hostile Environment: The Political Betrayal of Sexually Harassed Women (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000), 68–9.
57. 57Bull, “The Implications of Admitting Evidence,” 125–35.
58. 58Linda Hirshman, Sisters in Law: How Sandra Day O’Connor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg Went to the Supreme Court and Changed the World (New York: Harper Collins, 2015), 165.
60. 60Joan Hoff, Law, Gender, and Injustice: A Legal History of U.S. Women (New York: New York University Press, 1991), 434.
61. 61Colleen M. Davenport, “Sexual Harassment under Title VII: Equality in the Workplace or Second Class Status: Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson,” Hamline Law Review 10 (1987), 221–2.
62. 62Hernandez, “What Not to Wear,” 292.
63. 63Hoff, Law, Gender, and Injustice, 255.
Bibliography
Baker, Carrie M. The Women’s Movement Against Sexual Harassment. New York: Cambridge
