specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
2. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
3. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
4. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
5. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
6. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Green Infrastructure for Water Management work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
7. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Green Infrastructure for Water Management changes?
<--- Score
8. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Green Infrastructure for Water Management?
<--- Score
9. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
10. Is there any additional Green Infrastructure for Water Management definition of success?
<--- Score
11. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
12. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
13. Is the Green Infrastructure for Water Management scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
14. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
15. What happens if Green Infrastructure for Water Management’s scope changes?
<--- Score
16. Will a Green Infrastructure for Water Management production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
17. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Green Infrastructure for Water Management brings?
<--- Score
18. Who approved the Green Infrastructure for Water Management scope?
<--- Score
19. What is the scope of the Green Infrastructure for Water Management work?
<--- Score
20. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
21. What is the definition of Green Infrastructure for Water Management excellence?
<--- Score
22. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
23. Will team members regularly document their Green Infrastructure for Water Management work?
<--- Score
24. What is the scope of Green Infrastructure for Water Management?
<--- Score
25. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
26. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
27. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
28. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
29. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
30. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
31. Will team members perform Green Infrastructure for Water Management work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
32. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
33. Have all basic functions of Green Infrastructure for Water Management been defined?
<--- Score
34. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
35. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
36. Is special Green Infrastructure for Water Management user knowledge required?
<--- Score
37. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
38. How would you define Green Infrastructure for Water Management leadership?
<--- Score
39. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
40. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
41. What is the context?
<--- Score
42. What gets examined?
<--- Score
43. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
44. How do you gather requirements?
<---
