86. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Green Infrastructure for Water Management leverage and how?
<--- Score
87. How do you catch Green Infrastructure for Water Management definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
88. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
89. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
90. Do you have a Green Infrastructure for Water Management success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
91. How do you manage unclear Green Infrastructure for Water Management requirements?
<--- Score
92. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
93. What is the scope of the Green Infrastructure for Water Management effort?
<--- Score
94. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
95. When is/was the Green Infrastructure for Water Management start date?
<--- Score
96. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
97. What are the Green Infrastructure for Water Management use cases?
<--- Score
98. How have you defined all Green Infrastructure for Water Management requirements first?
<--- Score
99. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
100. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
101. Why are you doing Green Infrastructure for Water Management and what is the scope?
<--- Score
102. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
103. Is Green Infrastructure for Water Management required?
<--- Score
104. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
105. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
106. How are consistent Green Infrastructure for Water Management definitions important?
<--- Score
107. What would be the goal or target for a Green Infrastructure for Water Management’s improvement team?
<--- Score
108. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
109. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
110. What was the context?
<--- Score
111. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
112. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
113. What system do you use for gathering Green Infrastructure for Water Management information?
<--- Score
114. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
115. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
116. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
117. Who is gathering Green Infrastructure for Water Management information?
<--- Score
118. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Green Infrastructure for Water Management? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
119. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
120. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
121. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
122. Is there a Green Infrastructure for Water Management management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
123. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
124. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
125. Are the Green Infrastructure for Water Management requirements testable?
<--- Score
126. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
127. How will the Green Infrastructure for Water Management team and the group measure complete success of Green Infrastructure for Water Management?
<--- Score
128. Are the Green Infrastructure for Water Management requirements complete?
