Score
12. What is the context?
<--- Score
13. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
14. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
15. What sources do you use to gather information for a Infrastructure-as-a-service study?
<--- Score
16. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
17. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
18. What system do you use for gathering Infrastructure-as-a-service information?
<--- Score
19. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
20. Is there a critical path to deliver Infrastructure-as-a-service results?
<--- Score
21. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
22. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
23. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
24. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
25. Is there any additional Infrastructure-as-a-service definition of success?
<--- Score
26. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
27. Will team members perform Infrastructure-as-a-service work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
28. How does the Infrastructure-as-a-service manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
29. Who approved the Infrastructure-as-a-service scope?
<--- Score
30. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
31. Do you have a Infrastructure-as-a-service success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
32. Is the Infrastructure-as-a-service scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
33. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
34. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
35. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
36. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
37. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
38. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
39. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Infrastructure-as-a-service work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
40. Are the Infrastructure-as-a-service requirements complete?
<--- Score
41. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
42. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
43. What is the definition of Infrastructure-as-a-service excellence?
<--- Score
44. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
45. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
46. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
47. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
48. When is/was the Infrastructure-as-a-service start date?
<--- Score
49. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
50. Is there a clear Infrastructure-as-a-service case definition?
<--- Score
51. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
52. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
53. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
54. Are improvement team members fully trained on Infrastructure-as-a-service?
<--- Score
55. Are the Infrastructure-as-a-service requirements testable?
<--- Score
56. What would be the goal or target
