business’s scope changes?
<--- Score
104. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Environmental business?
<--- Score
105. How are consistent Environmental business definitions important?
<--- Score
106. How do you gather Environmental business requirements?
<--- Score
107. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
108. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
109. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
110. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
111. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
112. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
113. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
114. Is Environmental business linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
115. How can the value of Environmental business be defined?
<--- Score
116. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
117. What are the Environmental business tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
118. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
119. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
120. What are the core elements of the Environmental business business case?
<--- Score
121. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
122. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
123. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
124. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
125. Is Environmental business currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
126. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
127. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
128. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
129. How did the Environmental business manager receive input to the development of a Environmental business improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
130. What was the context?
<--- Score
131. Will a Environmental business production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
132. Has a Environmental business requirement not been met?
<--- Score
133. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
134. Is there any additional Environmental business definition of success?
<--- Score
135. Will team members regularly document their Environmental business work?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Environmental business Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What is the cost of rework?
<--- Score
2. Are the units of measure consistent?
<--- Score
3. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?
<--- Score
4. Are the measurements objective?
<--- Score
5. What would it cost to replace your technology?
<--- Score
6. What
