Disaster risk management excellence?
<--- Score
105. What was the context?
<--- Score
106. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Disaster risk management goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
107. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
108. How have you defined all Disaster risk management requirements first?
<--- Score
109. Do you all define Disaster risk management in the same way?
<--- Score
110. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Disaster risk management? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
111. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
112. Why are you doing Disaster risk management and what is the scope?
<--- Score
113. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Disaster risk management work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
114. Will a Disaster risk management production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
115. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
116. What are the record-keeping requirements of Disaster risk management activities?
<--- Score
117. How would you define Disaster risk management leadership?
<--- Score
118. Who are the Disaster risk management improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
119. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
120. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
121. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
122. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
123. Is the Disaster risk management scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
124. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
125. Do you have a Disaster risk management success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
126. Is there a clear Disaster risk management case definition?
<--- Score
127. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
128. How are consistent Disaster risk management definitions important?
<--- Score
129. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
130. What are the Disaster risk management use cases?
<--- Score
131. How do you catch Disaster risk management definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
132. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Disaster risk management Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?
<--- Score
2. What disadvantage does this cause for the user?
<--- Score
3. Are there measurements based on task performance?
<--- Score
4. What do people want to verify?
<--- Score
5. Will Disaster risk management have an impact on current business continuity, disaster recovery processes and/or infrastructure?
<--- Score
6. What causes extra work or rework?
<--- Score
7. Are indirect costs charged to the Disaster risk management program?
<--- Score
8. What are the uncertainties surrounding estimates of impact?
<--- Score
