Employee Trust A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Employee Trust A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk страница 8
109. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
110. What is the scope of the Employee trust effort?
<--- Score
111. Will team members perform Employee trust work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
112. How do you gather Employee trust requirements?
<--- Score
113. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
114. How do you think the partners involved in Employee trust would have defined success?
<--- Score
115. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
116. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
117. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
118. Who approved the Employee trust scope?
<--- Score
119. What is in scope?
<--- Score
120. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
121. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
122. Is the Employee trust scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
123. Is there a Employee trust management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
124. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
125. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Employee trust?
<--- Score
126. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Employee trust work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
127. How does the Employee trust manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
128. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
129. How are consistent Employee trust definitions important?
<--- Score
130. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
131. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
132. How do you hand over Employee trust context?
<--- Score
133. How do you manage unclear Employee trust requirements?
<--- Score
134. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
135. Will team members regularly document their Employee trust work?
<--- Score
136. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
137. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Employee trust Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Has a cost center been established?
<--- Score
2. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?
<--- Score
3. What is the Employee trust business impact?
<--- Score
4. Have you made assumptions about the shape of the future, particularly its impact on your customers and competitors?
<--- Score
5. What is the cost of rework?
<--- Score
6. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Employee trust? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?
<--- Score
7. What harm might be caused?
<--- Score
8. What causes innovation to fail or succeed in your organization?
<--- Score
9. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?
<---