Stakeholder Management Plan: Transportation Security212
2.39 Change Management Plan: Transportation Security214
3.0 Executing Process Group: Transportation Security216
3.1 Team Member Status Report: Transportation Security218
3.2 Change Request: Transportation Security220
3.3 Change Log: Transportation Security222
3.4 Decision Log: Transportation Security224
3.5 Quality Audit: Transportation Security226
3.6 Team Directory: Transportation Security229
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Transportation Security231
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Transportation Security233
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Transportation Security236
3.10 Issue Log: Transportation Security238
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Transportation Security240
4.1 Project Performance Report: Transportation Security242
4.2 Variance Analysis: Transportation Security244
4.3 Earned Value Status: Transportation Security246
4.4 Risk Audit: Transportation Security248
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Transportation Security250
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Transportation Security252
5.0 Closing Process Group: Transportation Security254
5.1 Procurement Audit: Transportation Security256
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Transportation Security259
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Transportation Security261
5.4 Lessons Learned: Transportation Security263
Index265
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
2. How are the Transportation Security’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?
<--- Score
3. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with Transportation Security?
<--- Score
4. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Transportation Security delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
5. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?
<--- Score
6. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
7. What resources or support might you need?
<--- Score
8. Who should resolve the Transportation Security issues?
<--- Score
9. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?
<--- Score
10. Does Transportation Security create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?
<--- Score
11. What vendors make products that address the Transportation Security needs?
<--- Score
12. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
13. What is the recognized need?
<--- Score
14. Think about the people you identified for your Transportation Security project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?
<--- Score
15. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
16. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Transportation Security team, Transportation Security itself?
<--- Score
17. Is the need for organizational change recognized?
<--- Score
18. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?
<--- Score
19. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Transportation Security as an effective investment?
<--- Score
20. How do you recognize an Transportation Security objection?
<--- Score
21. Is it needed?
<--- Score
22. Did you miss any major Transportation Security issues?
<--- Score
23. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
24. What needs to be done?
<--- Score
25. What is the Transportation Security problem definition? What do you need to resolve?
<--- Score
26. What are your
