Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
13. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
14. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
15. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
16. What gets examined?
<--- Score
17. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
18. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
19. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
20. Is Transportation Security currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
21. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
22. Will team members regularly document their Transportation Security work?
<--- Score
23. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
24. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
25. What is the scope of Transportation Security?
<--- Score
26. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
27. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Transportation Security goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
28. What was the context?
<--- Score
29. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
30. What is the definition of Transportation Security excellence?
<--- Score
31. What would be the goal or target for a Transportation Security’s improvement team?
<--- Score
32. Is there a Transportation Security management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
33. Will a Transportation Security production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
34. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
35. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
36. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
37. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
38. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
39. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
40. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
41. Is there any additional Transportation Security definition of success?
<--- Score
42. Are the Transportation Security requirements complete?
<--- Score
43. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
44. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
45. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
46. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
47. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
48. Is the Transportation Security scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
49. How have you defined all Transportation Security requirements first?
<--- Score
50. How do you hand over Transportation Security context?
<--- Score
51. Is Transportation Security required?
<--- Score
52. What is in scope?
<--- Score
53. Has the Transportation Security work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
54. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Transportation Security work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
55. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
