study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
100. Have all basic functions of Transportation Security been defined?
<--- Score
101. What is the scope of the Transportation Security work?
<--- Score
102. What are (control) requirements for Transportation Security Information?
<--- Score
103. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
104. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
105. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
106. What are the record-keeping requirements of Transportation Security activities?
<--- Score
107. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
108. What are the core elements of the Transportation Security business case?
<--- Score
109. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
110. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
111. What happens if Transportation Security’s scope changes?
<--- Score
112. Is the scope of Transportation Security defined?
<--- Score
113. What are the Transportation Security tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
114. Why are you doing Transportation Security and what is the scope?
<--- Score
115. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
116. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
117. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
118. How did the Transportation Security manager receive input to the development of a Transportation Security improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
119. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
120. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
121. Are the Transportation Security requirements testable?
<--- Score
122. Is there a critical path to deliver Transportation Security results?
<--- Score
123. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
124. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
125. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
126. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
127. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
128. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
129. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
130. How do you catch Transportation Security definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
131. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
132. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
133. Are accountability and ownership for Transportation Security clearly defined?
<--- Score
134. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
135. How do you think the partners involved in Transportation Security would have defined success?
<--- Score
136. Is special Transportation Security user knowledge required?
<--- Score
137. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
138. How would you define Transportation Security leadership?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Transportation Security Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5
