System Development Methodologies A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу System Development Methodologies A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk страница 7
<--- Score
52. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
53. Is there a System Development Methodologies management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
54. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
55. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
56. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
57. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
58. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
59. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
60. How can the value of System Development Methodologies be defined?
<--- Score
61. What System Development Methodologies requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
62. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
63. Is System Development Methodologies linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
64. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
65. Will team members regularly document their System Development Methodologies work?
<--- Score
66. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
67. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does System Development Methodologies leverage and how?
<--- Score
68. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
69. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
70. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
71. Is the scope of System Development Methodologies defined?
<--- Score
72. Has the System Development Methodologies work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
73. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
74. Do you all define System Development Methodologies in the same way?
<--- Score
75. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
76. What system do you use for gathering System Development Methodologies information?
<--- Score
77. What are the record-keeping requirements of System Development Methodologies activities?
<--- Score
78. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
79. How will the System Development Methodologies team and the group measure complete success of System Development Methodologies?
<--- Score
80. Are the System Development Methodologies requirements testable?
<--- Score
81. What sources do you use to gather information for a System Development Methodologies study?
<--- Score
82. Is System Development Methodologies required?
<--- Score
83. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
84. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
85. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
86. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
87. How do you manage changes in System Development Methodologies requirements?
<--- Score
88. When is/was the System Development Methodologies start date?
<--- Score
89. How does the System Development Methodologies manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
90. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
91. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
92. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
93.