style="font-size:15px;"> 103. When is/was the Digital sensors start date?
<--- Score
104. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
105. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
106. What gets examined?
<--- Score
107. Has the Digital sensors work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
108. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
109. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
110. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
111. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
112. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
113. Will team members perform Digital sensors work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
114. How do you manage changes in Digital sensors requirements?
<--- Score
115. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
116. Who are the Digital sensors improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
117. Is there any additional Digital sensors definition of success?
<--- Score
118. Is the Digital sensors scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
119. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
120. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
121. How would you define Digital sensors leadership?
<--- Score
122. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
123. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
124. What system do you use for gathering Digital sensors information?
<--- Score
125. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
126. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
127. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
128. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Digital sensors leverage and how?
<--- Score
129. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
130. How can the value of Digital sensors be defined?
<--- Score
131. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
132. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
133. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
134. Have all basic functions of Digital sensors been defined?
<--- Score
135. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
136. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Digital sensors Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Digital sensors? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?
<--- Score
2. What are the Digital sensors key cost drivers?
<--- Score
3. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?
<--- Score
4. What are the costs of delaying Digital sensors action?
<--- Score
5. What is the total fixed cost?
<--- Score
6.
