Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
12. What Error level analysis services do you require?
<--- Score
13. What is the scope of Error level analysis?
<--- Score
14. What gets examined?
<--- Score
15. How are consistent Error level analysis definitions important?
<--- Score
16. Is the Error level analysis scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
17. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
18. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
19. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Error level analysis leverage and how?
<--- Score
20. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
21. Have all basic functions of Error level analysis been defined?
<--- Score
22. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
23. How can the value of Error level analysis be defined?
<--- Score
24. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
25. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Error level analysis work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
26. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
27. Who approved the Error level analysis scope?
<--- Score
28. What are the Error level analysis use cases?
<--- Score
29. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
30. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
31. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
32. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
33. What is the definition of Error level analysis excellence?
<--- Score
34. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
35. Has a Error level analysis requirement not been met?
<--- Score
36. What are the record-keeping requirements of Error level analysis activities?
<--- Score
37. Is the scope of Error level analysis defined?
<--- Score
38. Do you all define Error level analysis in the same way?
<--- Score
39. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
40. What is the scope of the Error level analysis work?
<--- Score
41. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
42. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Error level analysis results are met?
<--- Score
43. Has the Error level analysis work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
44. What is the scope of the Error level analysis effort?
<--- Score
45. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
46. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
47. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
48. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
49. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
50. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
51. How will the Error level analysis team and the group measure complete success of Error level analysis?
<--- Score
52. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
53. What Error level analysis requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
54. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
