<--- Score
55. Is special Error level analysis user knowledge required?
<--- Score
56. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Error level analysis changes?
<--- Score
57. Is there a Error level analysis management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
58. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
59. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
60. How do you gather Error level analysis requirements?
<--- Score
61. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
62. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
63. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
64. What would be the goal or target for a Error level analysis’s improvement team?
<--- Score
65. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Error level analysis?
<--- Score
66. Do you have a Error level analysis success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
67. Are accountability and ownership for Error level analysis clearly defined?
<--- Score
68. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
69. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
70. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
71. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
72. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
73. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
74. What is in scope?
<--- Score
75. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
76. What happens if Error level analysis’s scope changes?
<--- Score
77. What is the context?
<--- Score
78. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
79. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
80. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
81. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Error level analysis brings?
<--- Score
82. What are the core elements of the Error level analysis business case?
<--- Score
83. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
84. When is/was the Error level analysis start date?
<--- Score
85. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
86. How would you define Error level analysis leadership?
<--- Score
87. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
88. How do you manage unclear Error level analysis requirements?
<--- Score
89. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Error level analysis goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
90. Who is gathering Error level analysis information?
<--- Score
91. Will a Error level analysis production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
92. How do you think the partners involved in Error level analysis would have defined success?
<--- Score
93. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Error level analysis? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
94. Is there a critical path to deliver Error level analysis results?
<--- Score
95. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
96. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
97. Are there different segments of customers?
<---
