Score
47. What happens if Information systems security engineering’s scope changes?
<--- Score
48. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
49. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
50. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
51. How do you manage unclear Information systems security engineering requirements?
<--- Score
52. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
53. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
54. What Information systems security engineering requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
55. How do you hand over Information systems security engineering context?
<--- Score
56. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
57. What sources do you use to gather information for a Information systems security engineering study?
<--- Score
58. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
59. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
60. Do you have a Information systems security engineering success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
61. What are the Information systems security engineering use cases?
<--- Score
62. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
63. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
64. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
65. Is the Information systems security engineering scope manageable?
<--- Score
66. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
67. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Information systems security engineering leverage and how?
<--- Score
68. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
69. What is the scope of Information systems security engineering?
<--- Score
70. Has a Information systems security engineering requirement not been met?
<--- Score
71. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
72. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
73. What are (control) requirements for Information systems security engineering Information?
<--- Score
74. Who approved the Information systems security engineering scope?
<--- Score
75. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
76. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
77. What is the scope of the Information systems security engineering effort?
<--- Score
78. Is there any additional Information systems security engineering definition of success?
<--- Score
79. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
80. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
81. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
82. How are consistent Information systems security engineering definitions important?
<--- Score
83. Is special Information systems security engineering user knowledge required?
<--- Score
84. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
85. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
86. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
87. What is the definition of Information systems security engineering excellence?
<--- Score
88. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
89. How can the value of Information systems security engineering
