manageable?
<--- Score
64. How do you think the partners involved in Social cognition would have defined success?
<--- Score
65. How does the Social cognition manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
66. What happens if Social cognition’s scope changes?
<--- Score
67. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
68. How would you define Social cognition leadership?
<--- Score
69. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
70. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
71. Is Social cognition currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
72. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
73. Who are the Social cognition improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
74. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
75. What Social cognition requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
76. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
77. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
78. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
79. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
80. How did the Social cognition manager receive input to the development of a Social cognition improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
81. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
82. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Social cognition goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
83. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
84. How do you manage unclear Social cognition requirements?
<--- Score
85. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Social cognition brings?
<--- Score
86. What is in scope?
<--- Score
87. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
88. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
89. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
90. Do you all define Social cognition in the same way?
<--- Score
91. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
92. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
93. How will the Social cognition team and the group measure complete success of Social cognition?
<--- Score
94. How do you hand over Social cognition context?
<--- Score
95. Who is gathering Social cognition information?
<--- Score
96. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
97. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
98. When is/was the Social cognition start date?
<--- Score
99. Is there any additional Social cognition definition of success?
<--- Score
100. What system do you use for gathering Social cognition information?
<--- Score
101. Has a Social cognition requirement not been met?
<--- Score
102. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
103. What is the definition of Social cognition excellence?
<--- Score
104. Do you have a Social cognition success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
105. What Social cognition services do you require?
<--- Score
106. Has the Social cognition work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
107. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<---
