Score
46. Where is it measured?
<--- Score
47. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?
<--- Score
48. How can you measure Message Queuing as a Service in a systematic way?
<--- Score
49. How sensitive must the Message Queuing as a Service strategy be to cost?
<--- Score
50. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?
<--- Score
51. Have you made assumptions about the shape of the future, particularly its impact on your customers and competitors?
<--- Score
52. Does management have the right priorities among projects?
<--- Score
53. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Message Queuing as a Service? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?
<--- Score
54. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?
<--- Score
55. Which costs should be taken into account?
<--- Score
56. How do you measure success?
<--- Score
57. What would be a real cause for concern?
<--- Score
58. Who should receive measurement reports?
<--- Score
59. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?
<--- Score
60. What are the current costs of the Message Queuing as a Service process?
<--- Score
61. What users will be impacted?
<--- Score
62. How do you verify Message Queuing as a Service completeness and accuracy?
<--- Score
63. Who pays the cost?
<--- Score
64. What drives O&M cost?
<--- Score
65. What are the costs and benefits?
<--- Score
66. Are you aware of what could cause a problem?
<--- Score
67. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?
<--- Score
68. What are allowable costs?
<--- Score
69. How is progress measured?
<--- Score
70. What could cause delays in the schedule?
<--- Score
71. How will success or failure be measured?
<--- Score
72. What evidence is there and what is measured?
<--- Score
73. Have design-to-cost goals been established?
<--- Score
74. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?
<--- Score
75. How can you manage cost down?
<--- Score
76. Do you have a flow diagram of what happens?
<--- Score
77. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?
<--- Score
78. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Message Queuing as a Service services/products?
<--- Score
79. How will your organization measure success?
<--- Score
80. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?
<--- Score
81. How can you measure the performance?
<--- Score
82. Are you able to realize any cost savings?
<--- Score
83. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?
<--- Score
84. How much does it cost?
<--- Score
85. What measurements are being captured?
<--- Score
86. Are you taking your company in the direction of better and revenue or cheaper and cost?
<--- Score
87. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?
<--- Score
88. What are you verifying?
<--- Score
89. What could cause you to change course?
<--- Score
90. What are your operating costs?
<--- Score
91. What are hidden Message Queuing as a Service quality costs?
<--- Score
92. What are the costs of delaying Message Queuing as a Service action?
<---
