management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Message Queuing as a Service?
<--- Score
70. What extra resources will you need?
<--- Score
71. Do you know what you need to know about Message Queuing as a Service?
<--- Score
72. How are training requirements identified?
<--- Score
73. Who needs to know?
<--- Score
74. Does Message Queuing as a Service create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?
<--- Score
75. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will need?
<--- Score
76. How do you recognize an Message Queuing as a Service objection?
<--- Score
77. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Message Queuing as a Service will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
78. Does your organization need more Message Queuing as a Service education?
<--- Score
79. What are the expected benefits of Message Queuing as a Service to the stakeholder?
<--- Score
80. Which issues are too important to ignore?
<--- Score
81. Are losses recognized in a timely manner?
<--- Score
82. What resources or support might you need?
<--- Score
83. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?
<--- Score
84. Are there recognized Message Queuing as a Service problems?
<--- Score
85. Think about the people you identified for your Message Queuing as a Service project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?
<--- Score
86. What do you need to start doing?
<--- Score
87. What information do users need?
<--- Score
88. What does Message Queuing as a Service success mean to the stakeholders?
<--- Score
89. What are your needs in relation to Message Queuing as a Service skills, labor, equipment, and markets?
<--- Score
90. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Message Queuing as a Service leader?
<--- Score
91. Where do you need to exercise leadership?
<--- Score
92. What is the extent or complexity of the Message Queuing as a Service problem?
<--- Score
93. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?
<--- Score
94. Do you need to avoid or amend any Message Queuing as a Service activities?
<--- Score
95. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Message Queuing as a Service team, Message Queuing as a Service itself?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Message Queuing as a Service Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. When is/was the Message Queuing as a Service start date?
<--- Score
2. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
3. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
4. Has a Message Queuing as a Service requirement not been met?
<--- Score
5. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
6. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
7. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
8. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
9. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
10. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
11. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
12.
